Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers How do you draw that conclusion? If I am not in favor of land mine project 2025 politics then I do not consider there to be a problem? Good logic.
Nope not at all. My conclusion was drawn by the fact that you choose not to answer the question.....and with your reply to me you just added another missed opportunity to answer it. Its OK if you don't want to, no one is forcing you to admit or deny there is and has been a problem. It is a very simple question and it has nothing to do with not being in favor of "land mine project". Not sure why you are so resistant to answer the simple yes / no question but that is your choice and right. Carry on....
|
SarasotaSlim | 238 |
|
![]() |
Status quo we've been running is not sustainable....I don't know how anyone would disagree with this. |
SarasotaSlim | 238 |
|
![]() |
"liberation day" is now followed by "liquidation day"
|
cave0707 | 207 |
|
![]() |
@Raiders22 looks like he doesn't think there is a problem.....
|
SarasotaSlim | 238 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers The tesla event is not like J6 other than it being done by ignorant people who sadly don't realize they don't know any better. The tesla event is more like not eating french fries after 9/11 (freedom fries remember) Or Boycotting "Bud light" Or not watching NFL games because of "kneeling" See the theme here?? Accomplished nothing and was a waste of time, energy and resources. Just like the tesla event. |
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers You like that he kicks the other side and you agree with his biases, nothing wrong with that but he does not twist the knife on your group like ever and his schtick is heavily aimed at the left members here. Let's be real here and call it like it is. If you want to include me in a "group" then include me in the group that actually has conversation and not just regurgitates a copy & paste horse manure façade of a partisan non-sense. You and I and everyone else know exactly which three (maybe 4) usernames we are talking about and that is the other "group". There are plenty of posters here on the conservative and liberal sides who converse and go back and forth on issues. Sometimes it gets heated, fine OK when someone steps out of line then they get their time out. Nothing wrong with that. So the "groups" we have here are two: 1 - people on all sides of the political spectrum who converse with one another 2 - three or four usernames who do nothing but cut, paste, emoji, big font, color font, rinse and repeat ridiculous regime propaganda words like nazi, fuhrer, fascist, etc. etc. I hardly even post here anymore, most of the fun is gone and people in here seem to be living hanging on by a thread of sanity. I don't even respond to 90% of the BS I read because its so far out there I don't have the energy or attention span to give my time. No reason to try to make it something it is not and will never be.
|
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
@LSU0626 Speaking of smashing tesla cars. What I find ironic or comical, not sure which maybe both, is that the majority of tesla owners are likely to be more liberal people. So the radical shitlibs (different than regular joe libs) have no clue what the political affiliation is of the owners of the cars they are destroying and odds are the majority of cars being vandalized / destroyed are of liberals. pretty stupid. |
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
@LSU0626 Spock does not discriminate based on your political affiliation.... he's an equal opportunity poster with a sense of humor that is lost on most. Him calling Trump all those names is not an "unnecessary jab" as those are the names Trump is referred to in the majority of these threads that are commented on daily. He's just repeating what others say daily. You just walked into his "trap" is all and got caught, no hard feelings I'm sure, it happens to newcomers in this cesspool sub. It's like a welcoming message from him, a "test" if you will. The moderator's assessment provided to you on him is simply the opinion of one man, nothing more and nothing less....and you know what they say about opinions right.... Be well and watch out for yourself here in the cesspool |
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@kcblitzkrieg I think we are similar in thinking regarding gas/oil and commodities. Outside a massive unknown shock those markets are not going to move from posturing from a non-OPEC member. Trump is inflationary and recessionary in his posturing but it would take longer to cycle through. If anything his buzz saw job cuts and tariffs are bad for oil markets, they will reduce consumption and I would think oil would go much lower in a recession/stagflation scenario. Yes |
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers appreciate the clarification, I thought at first you were responding to me because you thought I said something otherwise.... |
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers I think it is amusing at best for anyone to think commodity markets to the pump can move in a material fashion in two months. |
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
@THEMUGG What's funny? With this state supreme court win Wisconsin will be able to redistrict their congressional map and pick up House seats.....Dems winning the House = another impeachment. Fun times. |
tjones1270 | 59 |
|
![]() |
The 22nd amendment makes President Trump constitutionally ineligible to run for a third term and the 12th amendment makes him constitutionally ineligible to run as vice president. That said there is no constitutional provision that says speaker of the house must be an elected member of Congress, and there is no constitutional provision that says a two term president cannot become speaker of the house. This would place him third in the order of succession. Now that said, if something happened to POTUS and VP, and our country was still standing, we would still have a conflict of the 22nd amendment as the Constitution would overrule the succession act. They would either have to elect a new speaker or skip President Trump for the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. The Constitution is the law of the land. The only options are a constitutional amendment to repeal the 22nd amendment (short on votes) or an Article V convention (short on states) |
SarasotaSlim | 11 |
|
![]() |
Per Trump (in Trump voice) "That Pablos Escobars—very great guy, very smart man. Treated very unfairly. Ran a business, a big one, very successful. I binge-watched Narcos. Like no one’s ever binge-watched before" |
BigGame90 | 92 |
|
![]() |
@spockgato maybe check the stats year after year . My guess is around this time of the year they always begin to go up up up ….
stop with those facts and logic.
|
Cranky_Hank | 220 |
|
![]() |
|
BigGame90 | 92 |
|
![]() |
@spockgato "They" as in, the Constitution of the United States of America |
fubah2 | 60 |
|
![]() |
@Midnight1 It is certain to get worse before it gets better
I've been preaching this for years....we are on the path. It is the great ravine. Could take a decade plus. |
fubah2 | 363 |
|
![]() |
Breaking News: Trump pardoning El Chapo. Says he watched Narcos and enjoyed it very much. |
BigGame90 | 92 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Three miscreants enter an apartment building at 2:00 am, loudly hollering and laughing, then begin vomiting, pissing & shitting on all the hallway carpets. The next day, the vandals return and confront the building manager: "Your building STINKS! It's a CESSPOOL!!" Pretty...pretty pretty good (Larry David voice) Funny stuff coming from you, especially considering your three characters of the story are yourself and your two imaginary interweb buddies. Be well in these tough times....really hope you don't lose your social security |
cave0707 | 207 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.