Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I don't think anyone here on Covers or anywhere else went 6-1 on Super bowl 55. Great job and thanks! |
14allall41 | 69 |
|
|
Are you posting this weekend Sir? |
WrightTheBright | 111 |
|
|
replied to
If you love Football - and I know you do - You have to respect Drew Brees who most probably played his last NFL game
in NFL Betting You look at Brees all those years and you never even once think he is not gonna give his 100%. May be had flaws here and there, but, even if he loses your bet - you never feel betrayed. Cheers to great sports figure |
WrightTheBright | 31 |
|
|
Gold |
LB_Dirtbags | 19 |
|
|
Let's go Rams |
austrian | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by 14allall41:
14-10 College Football 22-12 NFL 5-2 yesterday NCAAF Today's picks" Ole Miss +9 While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama Under 67.5 You sure look like a genius |
14allall41 | 29 |
|
|
I'm getting used to this and will have a hard time if you ever stopped posting 14allall41.... Can't express my gratitude in words man. Really, really thank you!!! |
14allall41 | 884 |
|
|
#578 https://www.covers.com/forum/nfl-betting-21/did-you-make-any-money-betting-on-nfl-this-season-cause-i-did-see-how-103472682/23 He and DoubleUp4Life are disrupting that peaceful thread with offers of inside between the player gambling and creating a trouble i the place 14allall41 kept so peacefully and respectfully Thanks |
OneWhoKnows | 3 |
|
|
@asmth14 If at least 3 out of every 10 American's would read the book Adam Smith (I guess asmth stands for that) wrote (Wealth of Nations) - most of what you have described in a negative aspect and what the OP started this thread from - could be avoided. I remember the survey some 30 years ago conducted in high schools across the United States asking pupils who is Caspar Weinberger. Well, more than a half came up with a real quicky: the friendly ghost. And I do remember Beavis and Butthead episode when they are trying to enter crossing the border in Texas and in order to prove their claims they are Americans - they are asked what is the Capitol of the USA. Beavis looks up and sees Houston written on the wall so he kind of not sure but says: Houston? The border official smiles and welcomes both into the US saying - Welcome sons, every Mexican knows by heart Capitol of every state. You sure are Americans. Welcome |
undermysac | 73 |
|
|
@DoubleUp4Life Listen up Jack. There are no two ways around it. You will either take your private affairs out of this thread and get action in a separate thread or I will have to involve mods and then you'll be posting in a penalty box for a week. your choice |
14allall41 | 884 |
|
|
@Ksharp89
Quote Originally Posted by 14allall41:
Quote Originally Posted by m3ntal: Nice job man. Hopefully you don't go the T word on us.
I'm flattered you feel I am that good that can already go a T word on you In order to do that I have to deliver for a very long time and only if my bookie will refuse to accept my money, and the online books will close my accounts as well as Vegas will prevent my entrance to casinos - then, and only then - I might consider going T on you (just kiddin.. I wish to be that good). But, till then - you can be relaxed. Jut try to be a nicer person to your immediate family and all will be good Do you understand you fugging idiot? Or it has to beaten up into you? |
14allall41 | 884 |
|
|
Great job 14allall41. Keep it on and do not let your foot off the pedal |
14allall41 | 884 |
|
|
Sorry pal. Last night's game looked pretty legit. It really is a matter of your perspectives on sports entertainment mixed with gambling. Apply a little fix there and all will OK. Wish you a better perspective in a retrospective the very next time |
Chiefthechief1 | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by operatorX:
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers: Exactly. She stills her picks from livegamestips. From MK. So, if I can't post his picks and back then I was literally slaughtered online - why she can? Quote Originally Posted by operatorX: You would know all about stealing picks: https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/103249736/argentina---croatia-waiting-on-mkShe/He/Shehe is stealing the picks. I also know from whom You're full of it. The only resemblance between her and MK yesterday was that they both went 3-0. However, MK's picks were ND -6.5, Florida +1.5 and Over 2.5 Rounds in McGregor Khabib fight. |
MereuLaTimp | 45 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LogCottage: Ban this clown. It’s SO obvious by the M.O that this is Phixer. You're not making any sense whatsoever. You're just making an a$$ out of yourself. Come on now. Say I'm a Ph..r too
|
AhiTov1960 | 63 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by barneybeans: Covers, I read once anyone who is mentioning that man's name Logcottage just did - is being banned. Or at least penalized. Do us all a favor and send that Logcottage to where he belongs(after he comes back from a man to man oving cruise with Barney and Whitewedding of course)Oh really? You have a great memory - something so miniscule as that, as a noob you remember that? How many aliases do you have here anyway - this is just another one. Now this Israeli "NOOB" is also a Ph..r? Read back his previous posts. And, BTW, the "NOOB" just kicked your lilly a$$ whoever is hiding under the aliases of barneybob and LogCottage. To me it seems obvious. Anyone disagreeing with you or being disgusted by you (like me) and your sleazy style - is a Ph...r. Anyone and everyone. You come to existence only when his name can be or is mentioned. I'm sure I am also one of his aliases in your eyes. I feel sorry for you and your sorry a$$ live(s). Now this Israeli "NOOB" is also a Ph..r?
|
AhiTov1960 | 63 |
|
|
The first half bet on the Cavs covering: Quote Phixer: The famous trend of the teams covering the first half of game 3 at home in the series they trail 0-2 is perfectly fit here as it is also the conference finals and unless LBJ wants to go down into history as the openly biased manipulator with no respect for his own fans - this first half will go to the Cavs. Quote MK (10 unit pick): This is game 3 of the series. The Celtics hold a commanding 2-0 lead. Will the series get even in Cleveland? Will the Celtics prove basketball is not an individual but a team game? There are very few strong trends that are not only statistical, but psychological. The trend that says the teams down 0-2 in the series after losing the first two games away from home - will cover the first half of game 3 at home with 85% probability - has a psychological root as well as a statistical one. CLE Cavaliers -5.5 First Half 10 units |
OneWhoKnows | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AhiTov1960:
Or you believe the Swiss could really beat an NHL players filled Team Canada? Or the Germans could do the same in the Olympics? Well, some read the script and the others may even have written it themselves. Those who know what Ia m talking about and who I am talking about are quietly smiling and saying to themselves - please, please, stop right there, we don't want you to let everyone to know... But, yes, the life is fixed and everything else corrupted except one and only thing - the sports! You're talking bout MK's +365 10 unit wager on the Swiss! |
bmiller1632 | 44 |
|
|
https://tinyurl.com/y745mhtf
This is today's first 10 unit play and will feature a semi final played in Denmark between the Swiss who just ousted the Finns in the quarterfinals and Canada who beat the Russians in OT in other quarterfinals. In an earlier game today the Swedes defeated USA 6-0. The Swiss defeated the same Finns that defeated earlier Canada in the group stages. Canada is playing a very weak hockey in this championship and reached the semis thanks to a win against not stable Russia That scenario is impossible against the stern Swiss who play real hockey from minute one and ousted the best team IMO in the championship - Finland. Lots of birds are singing Swiss this early afternoon. I'm a 10 unit confident in my pick. Switzerland ML +365 10 units |
bevoaustintx | 80 |
|
|
MK had Switzerland ML for +365 and won on a 10 unit play |
bevoaustintx | 80 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.