Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
What is todd bowles doing on defense over there to be so bad ? |
Yanasaur | 19 |
|
|
That last matchup was a defensive disgusting performance from both , the difference is falcons d has not continued to look so bad and Tampa has gotten worse You get to bet against the worst d that is busting coverages regularly and has now missed its top 2 wideouts Falcons are mid but they at least do some fundamentals |
Yanasaur | 19 |
|
|
What's the system on the bills ? |
theclaw | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Thanks guys. Too much of a bullwhip effect in what I am currently doing. I have to fix it this week. My ratings and numbers need to react quicker. Case in point.... Commanders. Their offense is on a stretch that is epic, but my numbers on them only creep up because of trailing data dragging it down. That is probably the hardest thing to accomplish in analyzing the NFL. To get this right. Too much or too little history will kill you. As it is today. Time to get to work. Traction, and therefore near future units will be way down I expect. But you faded the saints last week so the same process worked then ? This is why handicappers are a rare breed. Normal people just say it's random and don't think further.. And it really kinda is. Commanders shit the bed vs Tampa. They ain't all that. |
vanzack | 201 |
|
|
@theclaw
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by MDAAKD: The last team I would bet against right now is the O’Connell led Vikings. There are better games on the slate. Buy low, sell high. You are buying Vikings high. When you say you don't want to bet against them that is telling you that you are buying high. You wouldn't say that if you were buying low. Just a thought................... Feel buying high on green bay too they are super high thought of in market now - and have played worse competition. Colts/titans vs niners/texans is huge edge to vikings. i think if we were buying high on vikings this line would be more like a pickem. which i feel like it should be for as good as vikings been. |
theclaw | 69 |
|
|
saints -3 ! eagles can't stop the run. a slaughter. colts 1 - bears can't run and perfect situational spot browns -6.5 - daniel jones vs a suffocating jim schwartz d dallas 1 - parsons vs shit oline. , not the same ravens teams of past chiefs -3 - cousins is not in rythm yet struggles vs blitz, chiefs were great week 1 and falcons sucked and now it's flipped ?
bears/colts u 43.5 eagles/saints o 49.5 browns giants u 38.5 broncos/bucs u 41 wash/cincy o 47 chargers/steelers u 35
|
bucknut5 | 2 |
|
|
Giants gonna be able to score on that browns d ? Feels like browns suffocate Jones and get some turnovers finally. Gotta think browns can put up 20 on this giants d. |
vanzack | 137 |
|
|
@KyleBowler
And none were dominated or ill prepared as much as Carolina |
Player12 | 16 |
|
|
Agree. Ppl say well the trends say they bounce back. But if you slightly adjust the trend it doesn't work. Panthers can't defend the run. Canales vs harbaugh is massive. One team is buttoned up. Other team isn't prepared. Then look at the QBs. |
KempDunkLister | 7 |
|
|
Thursday Buffalos -10. Prime has improved the dline vastly and hired Sapp they will stop the run and on offense will spread out the slower Dakota Friday Tcu -9.5 big bounce back spot for horned frogs. After natty they expected hangover year and now they have peak bounce back in the positive direction motivation. Badgers -23 someone check out the weight room program in kalamazoo. They get massacred in the second half. Then you have longo who excels at running it up late in games. Huge bounce back year for badgers.
|
bucknut5 | 1 |
|
|
@Mananddogs Also sdstu doesn't have the Arizona transfer Johnson. He was one guy who could matchup with UConn in the post |
LB_Dirtbags | 53 |
|
|
@Griswold1 I agree... is it not always like this where u just ride the hot and cold streaks ? Just play the streaks this year. Bills are a play on now |
Griswold1 | 5 |
|
|
why do these trends only go back 2018 or 2020 ? ..so if it goes back to 2000 it's no good trend ? maybe thats not a solid trend then alot of the trends just don't make sense. why does if the next game is on the road matter ? or if home field doesn't mean much these days why are home divisional dogs so much more profitable then away divisional dogs |
jowchoo | 58 |
|
|
Thoughts on the Devils? |
SunDevil415 | 12 |
|
|
@Crater They should of ran it there and picked up a first imo |
vanzack | 29 |
|
|
Broncos were the right side last game and match up well. Amazing how people are able to ignore denver dominating the boxscore That said i dont trust denver, but cant get down with the easy kc victory just cant see how you ignore the last contest |
HabsHater88 | 25 |
|
|
great info in here |
FormerAthlete | 3 |
|
|
Say you want to put down a dime, or 20,30k on some games or more like a whale right upfront at the cashier. These guys bringing straight cash to the sportsbook , credit cards have limits, bitcoin ? - not talking online talking in person at the book |
bucknut5 | 3 |
|
|
@LB_Dirtbags do you watch all the games ? just wondering with so many teams - how it's possible to bet this sport. How many teams do you have a grasp of. |
LB_Dirtbags | 33 |
|
|
that creighton play sounds like it should be more than a 2 unit. nice writeup lmk when you have some 5 units |
LB_Dirtbags | 50 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.